Ford v. State
763 So. 2d 1273, 2000 WL 1145791
Opinion
James B. FORD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.
*1274 James B. Ford, Century, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant's 1997 sentence as an habitual offender, as such sentences are not affected by the supreme court's decision in Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla. 2000) (revised opinion). An habitual offender sentence is not a guidelines sentence even where, as here, the actual sentence imposed coincides with the bottom of guidelines.
GUNTHER, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ford v. State, 763 So. 2d 1273, 2000 WL 1145791 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
763 So. 2d 1273 (Ford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nix v. State
795 So. 2d 243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Hepburn v. State
778 So. 2d 448 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Mitchell v. State
775 So. 2d 428 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Pitts v. State
771 So. 2d 1259 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)