Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal

2 N.E.3d 238, 137 Ohio St. 3d 561
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 17, 2013·No. No. 2012-0462·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 137 Ohio St.3d 373, 2013-Ohio-4733, 999 N.E.2d 614. The cause is remanded to the appellate court for further proceedings.

O’Connor, C.J., and O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. Pfeifer and O’Neill, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal, 2 N.E.3d 238, 137 Ohio St. 3d 561 (Ohio 2013).

2 N.E.3d 238 (Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal
2016 Ohio 5928 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal
2013 Ohio 5199 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2013)