Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal
This text of 2013 Ohio 5199 (Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal, 137 Ohio St.3d 561, 2013-Ohio-5199.]
FORD MOTOR CREDIT COMPANY, APPELLANT v. AGRAWAL, APPELLEE. [Cite as Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Agrawal, 137 Ohio St.3d 561, 2013-Ohio-5199.] Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on the authority of Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.—Cause remanded for further proceedings. (No. 2012-0462—Submitted November 20, 2013—Decided December 17, 2013.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 96413, 2011-Ohio-6474. ____________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 137 Ohio St.3d 373, 2013-Ohio-4733, 999 N.E.2d 614. The cause is remanded to the appellate court for further proceedings. O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., concur. PFEIFER and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent. ____________________ O’Melveny & Myers, L.L.P., and Jonathan D. Hacker; Tucker, Ellis & West, L.L.P., and Irene C. Keyse-Walker; and Frantz Ward, L.L.P., Brett K. Bacon, Colleen C. Murnane, and Gregory R. Farkas, for appellant. The Misra Law Firm, L.L.C., and Anand N. Misra; and Robert S. Belovich, for appellee. Severson & Werson and Jan T. Chilton, urging reversal for amicus curiae, American Financial Services Association. _________________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2013 Ohio 5199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ford-motor-credit-co-v-agrawal-ohio-2013.