Forbes v. State

681 So. 2d 911, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1996 WL 604436
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 23, 1996·No. No. 95-0916·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions. We reverse the trial court’s imposition of a departure sentence.

The trial court sentenced appellant to twenty-five years in prison on his conviction of armed robbery and to concurrent five-year sentences for his convictions of burglary and false imprisonment. The twenty-five-year sentence constitutes a departure from the sentencing guidelines. The state concedes and we agree that the departure sentence must be reversed because the trial court failed to enter a written order explaining its reasons for the departure.

Accordingly, we affirm appellant’s conviction. We reverse appellant’s sentence for armed robbery and remand this cause to the trial court with instructions to resentence appellant within the guidelines. See Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990); McGowan v. State, 648 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART and REMANDED.

DELL, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forbes v. State, 681 So. 2d 911, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11123, 1996 WL 604436 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

681 So. 2d 911 (Forbes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McGowan v. State
648 So. 2d 1225 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Pope v. State
561 So. 2d 554 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)