Forbes v. State

676 So. 2d 79, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7141, 1996 WL 382344
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 10, 1996·No. No. 96-1665·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. State v. Salmon, 636 So.2d 16 (Fla.1994)(allegations that were or could have been made in previous postconviction motions do not constitute basis for granting later motion); Forbes v. State, 664 So.2d 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Forbes v. State, 661 So.2d 13 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forbes v. State, 676 So. 2d 79, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7141, 1996 WL 382344 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

676 So. 2d 79 (Forbes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Salmon
636 So. 2d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1994)