Forbes v. Napolitano

260 F.3d 1159, 2000 WL 33407082
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Forbes v. Napolitano. Read the opinion of the Court — 236 F.3d 1009
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 9, 2001·No. 99-17372·Published

Opinion

260 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2001)

FRED FORBES; MARGARET BOHN; JOHN L. SUMMERS; ANN S. ANDERSON, STUART R. SNIDER; GEORGE MELCHER, JR.; CHRISTOPHER TISCH; PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF CENTRALAND NORTHERN ARIZONA, INC.; ROBERT TAMIS, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
JANET NAPOLITANO, in her capacity as Attorney General, State of Arizona; STEPHEN NEELY, in his capacity as County Attorney, Pima County, Arizona, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 99-17372

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Argued and Submitted October 3, 2000--San Francisco, California
Filed December 29, 2000
Order Amending Opinion Filed April 11, 2001
Second Amendment Filed August 9, 2001

NOTE: SEE OPINIONS AT 236 F.3d 1009, AND 247 F.3d 903.

Bebe J. Anderson, The Center for Reproductive Law & Policy, New York, N.Y. and Michael Owen Miller, Miller Smith LLP, Tucson, Arizona, for the plaintiffs-appellees.

Charles R. Pyle, Assistant Attorney General, Tucson, Arizona, for the defendants-appellants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona William D. Browning, District Judge, Presiding, D.C. No. CV-96-00288-WDB

Before: Joseph T. Sneed, Mary M. Schroeder, and Richard A. Paez, Circuit Judges.

Prior report: 236 F.3d 1009 SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.

The opinion filed December 29, 2000 is amended as follows: at page 4510 of the slip opinion, lines 5-6 from the bottom, after the cite to City of Chicago v. Morales, add the parenthetical "(plurality)", so that it reads: City of Chicago v. Morales, 527 U.S. 41, 52, 119 S.Ct. 1849, 144 L.Ed.2d 67 (1999) (plurality).

The mandate may now issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Forbes v. Napolitano, 260 F.3d 1159, 2000 WL 33407082 (9th Cir. 2001).

260 F.3d 1159 (Forbes v. Napolitano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Chicago v. Morales
527 U.S. 41 (Supreme Court, 1999)
Forbes v. Napolitano
260 F.3d 1159 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)