Forbes v. Lucas (In re Lucas)

110 B.R. 335
CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee
DecidedOctober 17, 1989
DocketBankruptcy No. 386-05479; Adv. No. 388-0143; Civ. A. No. 3:89-0575
StatusPublished

This text of 110 B.R. 335 (Forbes v. Lucas (In re Lucas)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Forbes v. Lucas (In re Lucas), 110 B.R. 335 (M.D. Tenn. 1989).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

MORTON, Senior District Judge.

This is an appeal from the memorandum and order entered by the Bankruptcy Judge on June 8, 1989, 100 B.R. 969, determining that Forbes as Trustee was entitled to recover from the Holiday Corporation Savings and Retirement Plan certain sums of money which were contributed by Lucas to Holiday Corporation Savings and Retirement Plan, an ERISA qualified pension trust.

The opinion of the Bankruptcy Judge is incorporated herein as fully as if copied verbatim, is affirmed in its entirety, and is adopted by this court as the court’s opinion and memorandum.

Forbes, the Trustee, seeks to assess costs and attorney fees to the defendant because of an alleged frivolous appeal on the question involved. Since there is substantial doubt concerning the principle of law involved in this case, the court determines that the appeal was not frivolous and therefore does not tax costs and attorney fees against the defendant.

An appropriate order will be entered dismissing the appeal in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forbes v. Lucas (In Re Lucas)
100 B.R. 969 (M.D. Tennessee, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 B.R. 335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/forbes-v-lucas-in-re-lucas-tnmd-1989.