Forbes v. Dunham
24 Tex. 611
Opinion
There is nothing in this case to distinguish it from that of De Blane v. Lynch & Co., 23 Texas Rep. 25. In that case, it was held, that cotton grown upon land which was the separate property of the wife, and by the labor of slaves, also the separate property of the wife, was, nevertheless, the common property of both husband and wife. Upon the authority of the case of De Blane v. Lynch & Co., the judgment of the court below, in this case, will be reversed, and the cause remanded for another trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Forbes v. Dunham, 24 Tex. 611 (Tex. 1859).
24 Tex. 611 (Forbes v. Dunham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stephens v. Stephens
292 S.W. 290 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
In re Estate of Foster
4 Coffey 33 (California Superior Court, San Francisco County, 1909)
Stringfellow v. Sorrells
18 S.W. 689 (Texas Supreme Court, 1891)
Craxton, Wood & Co. v. Ryan
3 Willson 439 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1888)
Cleveland v. Cole
65 Tex. 402 (Texas Supreme Court, 1886)
Fitzpatrick v. Pope
39 Tex. 314 (Texas Supreme Court, 1873)