Craxton, Wood & Co. v. Ryan

Court of Appeals of Texas

Craxton, Wood & Co. v. Ryan

3 Willson 439

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedApril 14, 1888

DocketNo. 5698

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 3 Willson 439 (Craxton, Wood & Co. v. Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craxton, Wood & Co. v. Ryan, 3 Willson 439 (Tex. Ct. App. 1888).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 367. Community property; brick made on wife’s land, etc., is; case stated. Appellants caused an execution in their favor against A. P. Ryan to be levied upon a lot of brick. Josephine, wife of said A. P. Ryan, claimed said brick as her separate property, and upon a trial of the right of property thereto, had in accordance with the statute, the brick were adjudged to be her separate property and not subject to said execution. The-brick were made on land which was the separate property of the wife and out of the dirt of said land. The husband had nothing to do with the making of them, and paid no part of the expense of making them. Held, the brick were community property and subject to the execution. [De Blanc v. Lynch, 23 Tex. 25; Forbes v. Dunham, 24 Tex. 611; White v. Lynch, 26 Tex. 330; Cleveland v. Cole, 65 Tex. 402; Carr v. Tucker, 42 Tex. 330; 1 App. C. C. §§ 361, 362, 1071; Sayles’ Civ. Stat. art. 2852.] .

§ 368. Exceptions to judgment, when sufficient. The case was tried .by the judge without a jury, and appellants excepted to the judgment, and the exception was noted in the judgment entry. This was in accordance with the statute, and entitled appellants to appeal without a statement of facts, and to call in question the correctness of the judgment upon the facts, although said [440]*440conclusions had not been excepted to. [Sayles’ Civ. Stat. art. 1333; Ins. Co. v. Millikin, 64 Tex. 46.]

April 14, 1888.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Willson, J.

§ 367. Community property; brick made on wife’s land, etc., is; case stated. Appellants caused an execution in their favor against A. P. Ryan to be levied upon a lot of brick. Josephine, wife of said A. P. Ryan, claimed said brick as her separate property, and upon a trial of the right of property thereto, had in accordance with the statute, the brick were adjudged to be her separate property and not subject to said execution. The-brick were made on land which was the separate property of the wife and out of the dirt of said land. The husband had nothing to do with the making of them, and paid no part of the expense of making them. Held, the brick were community property and subject to the execution. [De Blanc v. Lynch, 23 Tex. 25; Forbes v. Dunham, 24 Tex. 611; White v. Lynch, 26 Tex. 330; Cleveland v. Cole, 65 Tex. 402; Carr v. Tucker, 42 Tex. 330; 1 App. C. C. §§ 361, 362, 1071; Sayles’ Civ. Stat. art. 2852.] .

§ 368. Exceptions to judgment, when sufficient. The case was tried .by the judge without a jury, and appellants excepted to the judgment, and the exception was noted in the judgment entry. This was in accordance with the statute, and entitled appellants to appeal without a statement of facts, and to call in question the correctness of the judgment upon the facts, although said [440]*440conclusions had not been excepted to. [Sayles’ Civ. Stat. art. 1333; Ins. Co. v. Millikin, 64 Tex. 46.]

April 14, 1888.

Eeversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Willson 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craxton-wood-co-v-ryan-texapp-1888.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack