Follette v. Burgos

406 U.S. 950, 92 S. Ct. 2043, 32 L. Ed. 2d 338, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 2591
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 22, 1972·No. No. 71-1173·Published·Cited by 291 cases

Opinion

C. A. 2d Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Cer-tiorari denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Follette v. Burgos, 406 U.S. 950, 92 S. Ct. 2043, 32 L. Ed. 2d 338, 1972 U.S. LEXIS 2591 (1972).

406 U.S. 950 (Follette v. Burgos) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LaRouche v. United States Department of Treasury
112 F. Supp. 2d 48 (District of Columbia, 2000)
Jones v. Capital Cities/ABC Inc.
168 F.R.D. 477 (S.D. New York, 1996)
Ute Indian Tribe v. State of Utah
935 F. Supp. 1473 (D. Utah, 1996)
Maida v. Andros
710 F. Supp. 524 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
Lehigh Valley Farmers v. Block
640 F. Supp. 1497 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1986)
American Maritime Ass'n v. United States
766 F.2d 545 (D.C. Circuit, 1985)
Seguros Banvenez, S.A. v. S/S Oliver Drescher
761 F.2d 855 (Second Circuit, 1985)
Taylor v. Teletype Corp.
550 F. Supp. 781 (E.D. Arkansas, 1982)
Factors Etc., Inc. v. Pro Arts, Inc.
541 F. Supp. 231 (S.D. New York, 1982)
United States v. Eilberg
553 F. Supp. 1 (District of Columbia, 1981)
Washam v. JC Penney Co., Inc.
519 F. Supp. 554 (D. Delaware, 1981)
Gay v. Waiters' & Dairy Lunchmen's Union, Local No. 30
489 F. Supp. 282 (N.D. California, 1980)
Price v. Civil Service Commission
604 P.2d 1365 (California Supreme Court, 1980)