Folk v. Wallace Business Forms, Inc.

394 F.2d 240
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 1968
DocketNos. 11994, 11995
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 394 F.2d 240 (Folk v. Wallace Business Forms, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Folk v. Wallace Business Forms, Inc., 394 F.2d 240 (4th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

MacKENZIE, District Judge.

On October 21, 1957, Standard Business Forms, Inc. purchased Emerson D. Folk’s interest in that corporation. As part of the consideration for the sale, the usual agreements were executed under which Mr. Folk agreed not to compete in a three state area and not to hire employees of Standard Business Forms, Inc. for a ten year period.

In 1959, a declaratory judgment suit was instituted by Folk and his new company, National Business Forms, Inc. to clarify the contract provisions relative to Folk’s not hiring Standard’s employees. On August 12, 1959, a consent permanent injunction was entered as follows:

“Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows:
1. That the individual plaintiff, Emerson D. Folk, his heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors and assigns and the corporate plaintiff, National Business Forms, Inc., its officers, agents, servants, employees, attorneys, successors or assigns and all other persons in active concert or participation with them or either of them be and they are hereby permanently enjoined, inhibited and restrained from, directly or indirectly through any other person, firm or corporation or in any manner, until after December 31, 1967: Attempting to hire, hiring, employing or continuing to employ, without the prior written approval of W. E. Hendricks, any person except Charles B. Brown, as set forth in the agreement of October 21, 1957, who was or has been at any time from October 21, 1954, to October 21, 1957, employed by Standard Business forms, Inc., a corporation with principal offices in Gastonia, North Carolina.
2. It is further ordered that the defendant and its surety be and they are hereby discharged from any bond heretofore posted in this proceeding, and that the plaintiffs be taxed with the costs hereof.
This 12th day of August, 1959.
/s/ Wilson Warlick
Wilson Warlick
District Judge”.

Five years later, on October 14, 1964, Standard Business Forms, Inc., under [242]*242its new merged title of Wallace Business Forms, Inc., moved for a contempt citation against Emerson D. Folk and his corporation, National Business Forms, Inc., for violating the permanent injunction set forth in the paragraph just above. In brief, the citation charged that Folk and National Business Forms, Inc., either collectively or separately, “* * * employed or caused to be employed in violation of said consent judgment and consent permanent injunction Clyde Walker, Witzel K. Chastain and J. B. Hodgins, all three of whom were employed by [Standard Business Forms, Inc.] at some time during the period between October 21, 1954 and October 21, 1957”.

After extensive hearings over a period of three years, on June 16, 1967, Chief Judge Wilson Warlick of the District Court for the Western District of North Carolina found that the injunction had indeed been violated and supplemented that finding by an order filed August 28, 1967, finding civil contempt damages against Folk and National Business Forms, Inc., in favor of Wallace Business Forms, Inc. (formerly Standard Business Forms, Inc.) in the amount of $30,000.00 plus the costs arising from the prosecution of the contempt, and attorneys’ fees of $6,000.00.

From the contempt order this appeal was taken by Folk and National Business Forms, Inc.

From that portion of the order fixing damages and attorneys’ fees, a cross-appeal was taken by Wallace Business Forms, Inc. (formerly Standard Business Forms, Inc.).

The questions for decision on appeal are:

(1) Whether the finding of the trial court that Folk and National violated the injunction by employing Witzel K. Chas-tain, Clyde Walker and J. B. Hodgins, is supported by the evidence;

(2) Whether the evidence supports the trial court’s finding of injury to Standard or Wallace proximately resulting from the violation of the injunction found by the court;

(3) Whether the evidence authorizes a finding of damages in the amount of $30,000;

(4) Whether the award of attorneys’ fees was proper.

We find ample evidence to support the findings of the District Court that Folk and National Business Forms, Inc. violated the injunction; that the damages as found by him proximately flowed from the violation and that the award of attorneys’ fees was proper.

It is admitted that Chastain, Walker and Hodgins were employees of Standard Business Forms, Inc. during the period October 21, 1954 to October 21, 1957, and therefore covered by the permanent consent injunction of August 12, 1959, as being persons whose hiring was forbidden to Emerson D. Folk, National Business Forms, and all persons or corporations participating with Folk and National directly or indirectly.

Chastain, Walker and Hodgins left Standard and became employees of Eastern Business Forms, Inc., a corporation discussed by them as early as the fall of 1963, while they were still employed at Standard, and finally incorporated in September, 1964.

As early as February, 1964, while Chastain, Walker and Hodgins were still employed with Standard, Folk and National Business Forms were already aiding and abetting the three in creating Eastern Business Forms, Inc. It was then that Folk and National committed themselves for $35,000.00 for a press for Chastain, Walker and Hodgins, and this at a time when the personal credit of the three Standard employees could not possibly have warranted it. Incidentally, Chastain, a $12,000.00 a year employee of Standard, could make a $3,500.00 down payment in cash to Folk for the press equipment because Chastain “had this money left over from some bonds he had sold in the fall of 1963 to take care of his daughter’s wedding and had been carrying around in cash ever since.” Note [243]*243that the down payment was made to Folk who ordered the press, in National’s name, from the manufacturer.

Six months later, in August, 1964, one month before the Eastern Business Forms, Inc. began business, and two or three weeks after Chastain had left Standard, Folk loaned Chastain $40,-000.00, without any security, on a note written in pencil on a piece of scrap paper. According to Chastain, he did not tell Folk what the money was for, nor did Folk ask him. Folk could not remember whether he knew of Chastain’s new business venture or not. Chastain, at the time, was out of work and his $9,000.00 home had a $10,000.00 mortgage to Folk already on it. At this point, Folk and National were underwriting Chastain, Walker, Hodgins and Eastern for $89,000.00 consisting of guaranteeing the payment of a press ($35,000.00), a rubber plate machine ($4,000.00), an unrecorded mortgage on Chastain’s home ($10,000.00), and an unsecured loan to Chastain ($40,000.00).

At the time of the hiring by Eastern of Chastain, Walker and Hodgins, Folk had provided $50,000.00 (through “loans” to Chastain) of the total subscribed capital of Eastern of $85,000.00. In addition, through his corporate credit guarantee, he had made possible the press, the one major item, and the rubber plate machine, the second of the absolute requirements for Eastern to begin operations.

The trial court was justified in finding such financing indicated a greater interest by Folk and National in Chas-tain, Walker, Hodgins and Eastern Business Forms, Inc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ePlus Inc. v. Lawson Software, Inc.
946 F. Supp. 2d 472 (E.D. Virginia, 2013)
Wagner v. BOARD OF EDUC., MONTGOMERY COUNTY, MD.
340 F. Supp. 2d 603 (D. Maryland, 2004)
Malnar v. Whitfield
774 P.2d 1075 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 1989)
Graves v. Kemsco Group, Inc.
864 F.2d 754 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena of June 12, 1986
690 F. Supp. 1451 (D. Maryland, 1988)
United States v. Darwin Construction Co.
680 F. Supp. 739 (D. Maryland, 1988)
Royal International Optical Co. v. Texas State Optical Co.
586 P.2d 318 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1978)
Fisher v. Marubeni Cotton Corp.
526 F.2d 1338 (Eighth Circuit, 1975)
Atlas Corp. v. DeVilliers
447 F.2d 799 (Tenth Circuit, 1971)
Heyman v. Kline
344 F. Supp. 1088 (D. Connecticut, 1970)
R. E. Harrington, Inc. v. Frick
446 S.W.2d 845 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 F.2d 240, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folk-v-wallace-business-forms-inc-ca4-1968.