Foley v. D'Agostino

20 A.D.2d 770, 248 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 17, 1964·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, entered November 1, 1963, denying plaintiffs’ motion for temporary injunction and appointment of receiver, unanimously affirmed, on the law and the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs. Plaintiffs have failed to make a sufficient factual showing of urgent necessity and imminent and irreparable substantial damage to justify the drastic relief sought. The plaintiffs’ remedy here is to press for an early trial. (See 10 Carmody-Wait, New York Practice, Injunctions, pp. 516-559; 28 N. Y. Jur., Injunctions, pp. 314-332.) See, also, opinion of this court [21 A D 2d 60] on appeal from order dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint.) Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Eager and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foley v. D'Agostino, 20 A.D.2d 770, 248 N.Y.S.2d 131, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4215 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

20 A.D.2d 770 (Foley v. D'Agostino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tanzer Economic Associates, Inc. v. Universal Food Specialties, Inc.
87 Misc. 2d 167 (New York Supreme Court, 1976)