Foels v. Town of Tonawanda

27 N.Y.S. 113, 75 Hun 363, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 363, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 778
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 1894·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

LEWIS, J.

The existence of the hole in the sidewalk of the bridge, on one of the highways of the town, for such a length of time as to justify the jury in finding the highway commissioner guilty of negligence, was sufficiently established by the evidence. Whether the plaintiff’s negligence contributed to her injuries was, under the circumstances proven, a question for the jury. The defendant’s highway commissioner was in charge of the highway bridges of the town, including those within the corporate limits of the village of Tonawanda. The action was therefore properly brought against the town. There does not seem to be any reason for reversing the judgment. It should be affirmed. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Foels v. Town of Tonawanda, 27 N.Y.S. 113, 75 Hun 363, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 363, 56 N.Y. St. Rep. 778 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

27 N.Y.S. 113 (Foels v. Town of Tonawanda) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. City of Lincoln
27 Neb. Ct. App. 414 (Nebraska Court of Appeals, 2019)
Houston v. Town of Waverly
142 So. 80 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Corbin v. City of Huntington
94 S.E. 38 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1917)
Kirk v. Village of Homer
28 N.Y.S. 1009 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)