Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.

160 A.2d 627, 32 N.J. 277, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 206
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 9, 1960
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 160 A.2d 627 (Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd., 160 A.2d 627, 32 N.J. 277, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 206 (N.J. 1960).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.

Burling, J., concurring in result.

For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino—7.

For reversal—Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

L & L Oil Service, Inc. v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX.
773 A.2d 1220 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Velop, Inc. v. Kaplan
693 A.2d 917 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Walker Rogge v. Chelsea Title & Guar.
603 A.2d 557 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Miltz v. Borroughs-Shelving, a Div. of Lear Siegler, Inc.
497 A.2d 516 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
68th St. Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella
362 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Mason v. Niewinski
169 A.2d 195 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 A.2d 627, 32 N.J. 277, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fluoro-electric-corp-v-smith-transport-ltd-nj-1960.