Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.
160 A.2d 627, 32 N.J. 277, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 206
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Conford in the court below.
Burling, J., concurring in result.
For affirmance—Chief Justice Weintraub, and Justices Burling, Jacobs, Prancis, Proctor, Hall and Schettino—7.
For reversal—Hone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd., 160 A.2d 627, 32 N.J. 277, 1960 N.J. LEXIS 206 (N.J. 1960).
160 A.2d 627 (Fluoro Electric Corp. v. Smith Transport Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
L & L Oil Service, Inc. v. DIRECTOR, DIV. OF TAX.
773 A.2d 1220 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2001)
Velop, Inc. v. Kaplan
693 A.2d 917 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
Walker Rogge v. Chelsea Title & Guar.
603 A.2d 557 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1992)
Miltz v. Borroughs-Shelving, a Div. of Lear Siegler, Inc.
497 A.2d 516 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1985)
68th St. Apts., Inc. v. Lauricella
362 A.2d 78 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Mason v. Niewinski
169 A.2d 195 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1961)