Floyd v. State

929 So. 2d 1191, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961, 2006 WL 1541085
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 7, 2006·No. No. 4D05-705·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Myshion Floyd’s appeal on the charge of battery on a law enforcement officer. We remand, however, to the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment form entered by the trial court shows an “X” marking the option that Floyd “Entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes,” and then lists the offense of battery on a law enforcement officer. However, the record shows that Floyd actually entered a written plea of not guilty, and was subsequently found guilty by jury trial. Appellant need not be present to correct this error.

Affirmed; Remanded.

STEVENSON, C.J., SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. State, 929 So. 2d 1191, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961, 2006 WL 1541085 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

929 So. 2d 1191 (Floyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Williams v. State
156 So. 3d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)