Floyd v. State
This text of 929 So. 2d 1191 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm Myshion Floyd’s appeal on the charge of battery on a law enforcement officer. We remand, however, to the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment form entered by the trial court shows an “X” marking the option that Floyd “Entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes,” and then lists the offense of battery on a law enforcement officer. However, the record shows that Floyd actually entered a written plea of not guilty, and was subsequently found guilty by jury trial. Appellant need not be present to correct this error.
Affirmed; Remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
929 So. 2d 1191, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961, 2006 WL 1541085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.