Floyd v. State

929 So. 2d 1191, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961, 2006 WL 1541085
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 7, 2006
DocketNo. 4D05-705
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 929 So. 2d 1191 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. State, 929 So. 2d 1191, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961, 2006 WL 1541085 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Myshion Floyd’s appeal on the charge of battery on a law enforcement officer. We remand, however, to the trial court to correct a scrivener’s error. The judgment form entered by the trial court shows an “X” marking the option that Floyd “Entered a plea of nolo contendere to the following crimes,” and then lists the offense of battery on a law enforcement officer. However, the record shows that Floyd actually entered a written plea of not guilty, and was subsequently found guilty by jury trial. Appellant need not be present to correct this error.

Affirmed; Remanded.

STEVENSON, C.J., SHAHOOD and MAY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Williams v. State
156 So. 3d 4 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
929 So. 2d 1191, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 8961, 2006 WL 1541085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.