Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Floyd v. State

Floyd v. State

563 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4561, 1990 WL 86316
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Floyd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2105 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 27, 1990·No. No. 89-1011·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based upon the state’s concession of error we reverse and remand with directions that appellant’s conviction for trafficking be vacated. We affirm, however, appellant’s conviction for possession of drug paraphernalia.

ANSTEAD, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. State, 563 So. 2d 205, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4561, 1990 WL 86316 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 205 (Floyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.