Floyd v. State

593 So. 2d 333, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1790, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 577
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 25, 1992·No. No. 91-1503·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Smith v. State, 529 So.2d 1106, 1107 (Fla.1988); Hicks v. State, 559 So.2d 1265, 1266 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Zimmerman v. State, 554 So.2d 670 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990); Key v. State, 452 So.2d 1147 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. denied, 459 So.2d 1041 (Fla.1984).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. State, 593 So. 2d 333, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 1790, 17 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 577 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

593 So. 2d 333 (Floyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Key v. State
452 So. 2d 1147 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Smith v. State
529 So. 2d 1106 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1988)
Hicks v. State
559 So. 2d 1265 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Zimmerman v. State
554 So. 2d 670 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)