Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Floyd v. State

Floyd v. State

161 So. 2d 17
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Floyd v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 170 So. 2d 599 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 18, 1964·No. No. E-370·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See [18]*18Savage v. State (Fla.App.1963) 156 So.2d 566; King v. State (Fla.App.1963) 157 So. 2d 440.

CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Floyd v. State, 161 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

161 So. 2d 17 (Floyd v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Savage v. State
156 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
King v. State
157 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)