Floyd v. State
161 So. 2d 17
This text of 161 So. 2d 17 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Floyd v. State, 161 So. 2d 17 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).
Opinion
The briefs and the record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. See [18]*18Savage v. State (Fla.App.1963) 156 So.2d 566; King v. State (Fla.App.1963) 157 So. 2d 440.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Savage v. State
156 So. 2d 566 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
King v. State
157 So. 2d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
161 So. 2d 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.