Floyd v. State
This text of 389 So. 2d 967 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After giving oral notice of appeal from his conviction for robbery, the defendant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking to lower his $50,000.00 bail pending appeal. After a hearing, the trial judge denied the petition “after considering all the circumstances.”
The case is controlled by Pace v. State, 45 Ala.App. 132, 226 So.2d 676 (1969). The provisions of Alabama Code 1975, Section 12-22-170, governing bail pending appeal after conviction are not within the influence of the Alabama Constitution of 1901, Section 6, which prohibits excessive bail. Pace, 45 Ala.App. at 133, 226 So.2d 676.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 So. 2d 967, 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-alacivapp-1980.