Floyd v. State

389 So. 2d 967, 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1411
CourtCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama
DecidedOctober 28, 1980
Docket5 Div. 524
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 389 So. 2d 967 (Floyd v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Floyd v. State, 389 So. 2d 967, 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1411 (Ala. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

BOWEN, Judge.

After giving oral notice of appeal from his conviction for robbery, the defendant filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking to lower his $50,000.00 bail pending appeal. After a hearing, the trial judge denied the petition “after considering all the circumstances.”

The case is controlled by Pace v. State, 45 Ala.App. 132, 226 So.2d 676 (1969). The provisions of Alabama Code 1975, Section 12-22-170, governing bail pending appeal after conviction are not within the influence of the Alabama Constitution of 1901, Section 6, which prohibits excessive bail. Pace, 45 Ala.App. at 133, 226 So.2d 676.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

All Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. R.D.
742 So. 2d 197 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1999)
Smith v. State
435 So. 2d 221 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
389 So. 2d 967, 1980 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/floyd-v-state-alacivapp-1980.