Flowers v. State

686 So. 2d 6, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1733, 1996 WL 82707
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 28, 1996
DocketNo. 94-03467
StatusPublished

This text of 686 So. 2d 6 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Flowers v. State, 686 So. 2d 6, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1733, 1996 WL 82707 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Fredrick Flowers appeals his judgments and sentences imposed following revocation of probation in case numbers 91-2131 and 92-1737. We affirm the revocation of probation in both cases, but direct the trial court on remand to enter proper written orders specifying the conditions of probation it found Mr. Flowers violated. Donley v. State, 557 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We also strike the court costs imposed in each case. On remand, the trial court must provide the statutory authority for each cost item it reimposes. See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed as modified and remanded with directions.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Donley v. State
557 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
686 So. 2d 6, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1733, 1996 WL 82707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.