Flowers v. State

686 So. 2d 6, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1733, 1996 WL 82707
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Flowers v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 8675
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 28, 1996·No. No. 94-03467·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Darrell Fredrick Flowers appeals his judgments and sentences imposed following revocation of probation in case numbers 91-2131 and 92-1737. We affirm the revocation of probation in both cases, but direct the trial court on remand to enter proper written orders specifying the conditions of probation it found Mr. Flowers violated. Donley v. State, 557 So.2d 943 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990). We also strike the court costs imposed in each case. On remand, the trial court must provide the statutory authority for each cost item it reimposes. See Sutton v. State, 635 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994).

Affirmed as modified and remanded with directions.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and FULMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flowers v. State, 686 So. 2d 6, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 1733, 1996 WL 82707 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

686 So. 2d 6 (Flowers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Donley v. State
557 So. 2d 943 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Sutton v. State
635 So. 2d 1032 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)