Flowers v. State
This text of 647 So. 2d 1082 (Flowers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pursuant to the State’s proper confession of error, the sentencing orders in case numbers 90-49879 and 91-22981 should be corrected to reflect credit for 462 days served. Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla. 1986) (when a defendant receives presen-tence jail-time credit on a sentence that is to run concurrently with other sentences, those other sentences also must reflect credit for time served). Because the correction of the orders is a ministerial matter, the defendant need not be present for resentencing.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
647 So. 2d 1082, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 214, 1995 WL 17636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.