Flowers v. Schenck

148 So. 581, 110 Fla. 256
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided May 17, 1933·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This case must be reversed and the cause remanded for further appropriate proceedings under authority of the opinion and judgment rendered by a majority of this Court and filed on January 18th, 1933, in the case of John C. McEwen and Virginia McEwen v. Arthur Schenck, Receiver of the Bank of Wauchula. It is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. Ellis, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flowers v. Schenck, 148 So. 581, 110 Fla. 256 (Fla. 1933).

148 So. 581 (Flowers v. Schenck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cantey v. Smith
164 So. 707 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Everglades Cypress Co. v. Tyner, Et Ux.
160 So. 513 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
New York Life Insurance v. Oates
166 So. 269 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
McDonald v. McDonald Holding Corp.
165 So. 363 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)
Smith v. Hogan
157 So. 183 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)
Oates, Et Ux. v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.
152 So. 671 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1934)