Flowers v. Schenck

Supreme Court of Florida

Flowers v. Schenck

148 So. 581, 110 Fla. 257

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 17, 1933

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 148 So. 581 (Flowers v. Schenck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flowers v. Schenck, 148 So. 581, 110 Fla. 257 (Fla. 1933).

Pincite

Opinions

This case must be reversed and the cause remanded for further appropriate proceedings under authority of the opinion and judgment rendered by a majority of this Court and filed on January 18th, 1933, in the case of John C. McEwen and Virginia McEwen v. Arthur Schenck, Receiver of the Bank of Wauchula. It is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This case must be reversed and the cause remanded for further appropriate proceedings under authority of the opinion and judgment rendered by a majority of this Court and filed on January 18th, 1933, in the case of John C. McEwen and Virginia McEwen v. Arthur Schenck, Receiver of the Bank of Wauchula. It is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.

DAVIS, C. J., and WHITFIELD, TERRELL, BROWN and BUFORD, J. J., concur.

ELLIS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 So. 581, 110 Fla. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flowers-v-schenck-fla-1933.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack