Florio v. Clark

660 S.E.2d 687, 52 Va. App. 18, 2008 Va. App. LEXIS 316
Court of Appeals of Virginia·Decided May 13, 2008·No. Record No. 2424-06-1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Upon a Rehearing En Banc.

By memorandum opinion dated October 30, 2007, a divided panel of this Court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. We stayed the mandate of that decision and granted rehearing en banc. Upon rehearing en banc, it is ordered that the stay of this Court’s October 30, 2007 mandate is lifted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority memorandum opinion in Joseph C. Florio v. Barbara E. Clark, William B. Clark and Joyce Childers, No. 2424-06-1, 2007 WL 3144034 (Va.Ct.App. Oct. 30, 2007), and we adopt that opinion as our own.

Judge Humphreys would reverse the trial court for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of the October 30, 2007 panel.

This order shall be certified to the trial court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florio v. Clark, 660 S.E.2d 687, 52 Va. App. 18, 2008 Va. App. LEXIS 316 (Va. Ct. App. 2008).

660 S.E.2d 687 (Florio v. Clark) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florio v. Clark
660 S.E.2d 687 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2008)