Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith

162 So. 2d 663, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2894
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedApril 8, 1964
DocketNo. 32766
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 So. 2d 663 (Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Smith, 162 So. 2d 663, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2894 (Fla. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Our initial consideration of the petition for certiorari suggested jurisdiction in this Court to review the decision of the District Court of ‘Appeal, Third District, Smith v. Florida East Coast Railway Company, Fla. App., 151 So.2d 70. After oral argument and further careful consideration of the record and briefs, we have concluded that there is no jurisdictional conflict between the decision of the District Court of Appeal and any prior decision of this Court or another District Court of Appeal. The writ is, therefore, discharged.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and THORNAL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur. ROBERTS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Montford v. Wainwright
162 So. 2d 663 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 So. 2d 663, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2894, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-east-coast-railway-co-v-smith-fla-1964.