Florida Bar v. Ashmann

166 So. 2d 140, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2545
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Florida Bar v. Ashmann. Read the opinion of the Court — 167 So. 2d 864
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 8, 1964·No. No. 33379·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In view of Ashmann’s plea of guilty to and conviction of three felonies on 24 June 1964 and his sentence to three years in the State Prison and no ensuing application for relief under Integration Rule 11.08 (2) (a), 31 F.S.A., Ashmann is hereby suspended from the practice of law under Rule 11.08(2).

Inasmuch as the fact of said convictions was not before the Board of Governors when it recommended that Ashmann be permitted to resign, the file is returned to the Board with directions to advise the Court promptly whether it desires to reaffirm its recommendation regarding Ash-mann’s request to be permitted to resign or whether it desires to proceed with appropriate disciplinary action in the light of events subsequent to its judgment under date of March 31, 1964.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORN-AL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Florida Bar v. Ashmann, 166 So. 2d 140, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2545 (Fla. 1964).

166 So. 2d 140 (Florida Bar v. Ashmann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.