Florida Bar v. Ashmann

Supreme Court of Florida

Florida Bar v. Ashmann

166 So. 2d 140, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2545

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 8, 1964

DocketNo. 33379

StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 2d 140 (Florida Bar v. Ashmann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Florida Bar v. Ashmann, 166 So. 2d 140, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2545 (Fla. 1964).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In view of Ashmann’s plea of guilty to and conviction of three felonies on 24 June 1964 and his sentence to three years in the State Prison and no ensuing application for relief under Integration Rule 11.08 (2) (a), 31 F.S.A., Ashmann is hereby suspended from the practice of law under Rule 11.08(2).

Inasmuch as the fact of said convictions was not before the Board of Governors when it recommended that Ashmann be permitted to resign, the file is returned to the Board with directions to advise the Court promptly whether it desires to reaffirm its recommendation regarding Ash-mann’s request to be permitted to resign or whether it desires to proceed with appropriate disciplinary action in the light of events subsequent to its judgment under date of March 31, 1964.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORN-AL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In view of Ashmann’s plea of guilty to and conviction of three felonies on 24 June 1964 and his sentence to three years in the State Prison and no ensuing application for relief under Integration Rule 11.08 (2) (a), 31 F.S.A., Ashmann is hereby suspended from the practice of law under Rule 11.08(2).

Inasmuch as the fact of said convictions was not before the Board of Governors when it recommended that Ashmann be permitted to resign, the file is returned to the Board with directions to advise the Court promptly whether it desires to reaffirm its recommendation regarding Ash-mann’s request to be permitted to resign or whether it desires to proceed with appropriate disciplinary action in the light of events subsequent to its judgment under date of March 31, 1964.

It is so ordered.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORN-AL, O’CONNELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur. THOMAS, J., dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 2d 140, 1964 Fla. LEXIS 2545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/florida-bar-v-ashmann-fla-1964.