Flores v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Flores v. State

195 S.W. 1150, 81 Tex. Crim. 445, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 6, 1917

DocketNo. 4552.

StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.W. 1150 (Flores v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Flores v. State, 195 S.W. 1150, 81 Tex. Crim. 445, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161 (Tex. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was -convicted of theft, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

One of the grounds of the motion for new trial is the alleged misconduct of the jury in discussing the failure of the defendant to testify. There is a statement oi; facts in regard to the matter, but it was filed long qfter the adjournment of court, and for that reason can not be considered. The other matters are of no serious import and need not be discussed;

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was -convicted of theft, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

One of the grounds of the motion for new trial is the alleged misconduct of the jury in discussing the failure of the defendant to testify. There is a statement oi; facts in regard to the matter, but it was filed long qfter the adjournment of court, and for that reason can not be considered. The other matters are of no serious import and need not be discussed;

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 S.W. 1150, 81 Tex. Crim. 445, 1917 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 161, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/flores-v-state-texcrimapp-1917.