Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Ferguson v. State

Ferguson v. State

147 S.W. 239, 66 Tex. Crim. 426, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 284
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 1912
DocketNo. 1715.
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 147 S.W. 239 (Ferguson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ferguson v. State, 147 S.W. 239, 66 Tex. Crim. 426, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 284 (Tex. 1912).

Opinions

HARPER, Judge.

The Assistant Attorney-General has moved to dismiss the appeal, because the recognizance is not in compliance with article 919 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The recognizance does not state the punishment assessed, and the motion is sustained. May v. The State, 40 Texas Crim. Rep., 196; Johnson v. The State, 49 S. W. Rep., 594; Martin v. The State, 89 S. W. Rep., 642.

Appeal dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. State
54 S.W.2d 140 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Clark v. State
46 S.W.2d 971 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)
Williams v. State
27 S.W.2d 226 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)
Flores v. State
198 S.W. 875 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.W. 239, 66 Tex. Crim. 426, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ferguson-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.