Flores v. Flores

666 So. 2d 605, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1996 WL 29226
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 26, 1996·No. No. 95-322·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Sharon Flores appeals the final order denying her petition for modification of the dissolution decree. We have reviewed the record and affirm the lower court’s order except for that portion denying Ms. Flores’s motion for attorney’s fees. Both parties agree that they had stipulated below that the issue of attorney’s fees would be addressed at a subsequent hearing. Accordingly, we reverse that portion of the court’s order denying Ms. Flores’s attorney’s fees and remand for an evidentiary hearing on the issue.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

W. SHARP, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flores v. Flores, 666 So. 2d 605, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 483, 1996 WL 29226 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

666 So. 2d 605 (Flores v. Flores) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Golliner v. Golliner
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2026
Jurasek v. Jurasek
67 So. 3d 1210 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)