Flockhart Foundry Co. v. Cox Automatic Pipe Bending Co.

124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 396, 11 Stock. 396, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 437
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 19, 1924·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

*397 For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Trenoi-iard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbaci-i, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Gardner, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, Kays—15.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Flockhart Foundry Co. v. Cox Automatic Pipe Bending Co., 124 A. 925, 96 N.J. Eq. 396, 11 Stock. 396, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 437 (N.J. 1924).

124 A. 925 (Flockhart Foundry Co. v. Cox Automatic Pipe Bending Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Havens v. Mohme Aero Engineering Corp.
39 A.2d 108 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1944)
Lessler v. Paterson National Bank
128 A. 800 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)