Fletcher v. State

563 So. 2d 812, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1990 WL 91886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fletcher v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 619 So. 2d 333
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 1990·No. No. 89-1448·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Dwight Fletcher appeals his convictions of trafficking in heroin and possession of cocaine with intent to sell. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the narcotics found in defendant’s purse. The trial court correctly concluded' that under the circumstances here presented, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the purse, and thus the court properly denied the motion to suppress. See California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 108 S.Ct. 1625, 100 L.Ed.2d 30 (1988); State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331, 1335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fletcher v. State, 563 So. 2d 812, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1990 WL 91886 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

563 So. 2d 812 (Fletcher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

California v. Greenwood
486 U.S. 35 (Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Oliver
368 So. 2d 1331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)