Fletcher v. State

563 So. 2d 812, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1990 WL 91886
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 3, 1990
DocketNo. 89-1448
StatusPublished

This text of 563 So. 2d 812 (Fletcher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fletcher v. State, 563 So. 2d 812, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1990 WL 91886 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Dwight Fletcher appeals his convictions of trafficking in heroin and possession of cocaine with intent to sell. He argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress the narcotics found in defendant’s purse. The trial court correctly concluded' that under the circumstances here presented, the defendant did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the purse, and thus the court properly denied the motion to suppress. See California v. Greenwood, 486 U.S. 35, 108 S.Ct. 1625, 100 L.Ed.2d 30 (1988); State v. Oliver, 368 So.2d 1331, 1335 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), cert. dismissed, 383 So.2d 1200 (Fla. 1980).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

California v. Greenwood
486 U.S. 35 (Supreme Court, 1988)
State v. Oliver
368 So. 2d 1331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
563 So. 2d 812, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4736, 1990 WL 91886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.