Fletcher v. Department of Education

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia
DecidedSeptember 12, 2014
DocketCivil Action No. 2014-1560
StatusPublished

This text of Fletcher v. Department of Education (Fletcher v. Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fletcher v. Department of Education, (D.D.C. 2014).

Opinion

FILED

~-SEP 1 2 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ~- . ~ ~- C|erk, u.s. o\smct and

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankm ptcy courts

DEBORAH DIANE FLETCHER, ) )

Plaintiff, )

)

v ) Civil Action N0. /z¢"/.§"@

DEPT. OF EDUCATION, ) )

Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

For purposes of this Memorandum Opinion, the Court consolidates four complaints that the plaintiff submitted to the Clerk of Court on August 7, 2014 and August l4, 2014. Upon review of the plaintiff s applications to proceed in forma pauperis and each pro se civil

complaint, the Court will grant the applications and dismiss the complaints,

The Court has reviewed plaintiffs complaints, keeping in mind that complaints filed by pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than those applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerrzer, 404 U.S. 5l9, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants, however, must comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. ]987). Rule S(a) of the F ederal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand

for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).

The complaints set forth few comprehensible factual allegations. The Court finds that none of the plaintiffs complaints contains a short and plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends or a viable claim showing that plaintiff is entitled to relief. Moreover, some of the allegations appear to duplicate allegations made in previously dismissed cases, and many of the allegations appear to have arisen beyond the jurisdiction of this Court. Because the complaints fail to meet the minimal pleading standard, they will be dismissed. An

Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

DATE: qilo\\q United §tates Qi,\;tri’ci’ludéev

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jarrell v. Tisch
656 F. Supp. 237 (District of Columbia, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fletcher v. Department of Education, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-department-of-education-dcd-2014.