Fletcher v. City of Oshkosh

18 Wis. 228
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1864
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 18 Wis. 228 (Fletcher v. City of Oshkosh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fletcher v. City of Oshkosh, 18 Wis. 228 (Wis. 1864).

Opinion

By the Oourt,

PAINE, J.

We do not feel called upon to review the elaborate argument of the appellant’s counsel, in respect to what would have been the liability of the city, upon the facts presented, in.the absence of any special provision in its charter. For, conceding all that the appellant claims, the special provision that does exist renders it all inapplicable. That provision is that, “ in no event, where work is ordered to be done at the expense of any lot or parcel of land, shall either the city or any ward be held responsible for the payment thereof.” Now, in the face of this provision, which says that the city shall in no event be liable, we are asked to hold that if the money is not collected in a reasonable time, in the mode which is provided, the city shall be liable. We are ask [232]*232ed to say that it shall be liable not only where [it neglects to assess the amount as a tax and cause it to be inserted in the next assessment roll, but also after it has done both these— has done all that it could do — if the treasurer fails to perform the duty which the law imposes on him. We know of no rule of construction, and certainly the counsel cited no case, that could justify a court in thus overriding a plain provision of law.

Whoever contracts for this kind of work, or deals in these certificates under such a charter, takes the risk of collecting his money in the manner provided, with a right to resort to the appropriate remedy to compel the officers to whom it is entrusted to discharge their duties, and he cannot come into a court and ask to hold the city liable, in the teeth of a provision which informed him at the outset that the city should in no event be liable.

The order sustaining the demurrer is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

County of Nassau v. Lincer
165 Misc. 909 (New York County Courts, 1938)
Powell v. City of Ada, Okl.
61 F.2d 283 (Tenth Circuit, 1932)
Severns Paving Co. v. Oklahoma City
1932 OK 307 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1932)
MacKenzie v. City of Anadarko
1918 OK 732 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)
Dahlman v. City of Milwaukee
110 N.W. 483 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)
Crawford v. Mason
98 N.W. 795 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1904)
City of Alton v. Foster
69 N.E. 783 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1904)
Farrell v. City of Chicago
65 N.E. 103 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1902)
Village of Park Ridge v. Robinson
65 N.E. 104 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1902)
City of Pontiac v. Talbot Pav. Co.
94 F. 65 (Seventh Circuit, 1899)
Kansas City v. Ward
35 S.W. 600 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1896)
Carroll v. City of St. Louis
4 Mo. App. 191 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1877)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
18 Wis. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fletcher-v-city-of-oshkosh-wis-1864.