Fleming v. Lundy

156 A.D.2d 965
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 20, 1989
DocketAppeal No. 2
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 A.D.2d 965 (Fleming v. Lundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fleming v. Lundy, 156 A.D.2d 965 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: We agree with Supreme Court that under the provisions of the agreement of November 7, 1981, Frederick [966]*966Lundy was obligated to pay one half of the taxes levied on the entire parcel plus his proportionate share of the remaining one half of the taxes. Thus, we agree with the court’s computation of the amount of the expenses of the property owed by defendants to plaintiffs in every respect but one. The court should have given defendants a credit of 44.4% of the $625 purchase price of the one-acre parcel purchased by defendant Frederick Lundy.

The court had no authority to grant attorneys’ fees in this partition action. Attorneys’ fees are incidents to litigation and are not compensable in the absence of an agreement or statutory authority (Matter of A. G. Ship Maintenance Corp. v Lezak, 69 NY2d 1, 5; City of Buffalo v Clement Co., 28 NY2d 241, 262-263, rearg denied 29 NY2d 640). The statute governing costs and expenses in a partition action (RPAPL 981) does not provide for an award of counsel fees incident to litigation. We do not decide the right to an extra allowance under CPLR 8303 inasmuch as neither party made application therefor.

Accordingly, we modify the order and judgment by reducing the amount awarded by $277.50, from $8,061.97 to $7,784.47, plus interest and costs, and by deleting the provision in the order for attorneys’ fees. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J. — partition and sale.) Present — Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kosovsky v. Kosovsky
2026 NY Slip Op 30696(U) (New York Supreme Court, New York County, 2026)
Fleming v. Lundy
156 A.D.2d 966 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 A.D.2d 965, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fleming-v-lundy-nyappdiv-1989.