Fleming v. . Davenport

21 S.E. 188, 116 N.C. 153
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 5, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Furohes, J.:

This case is controlled by Ballard v. Johnson, 114 N. C., 141, and is so fully discussed there, we see no reason for discussing it in this case.

*157 The defendant was entitled to bis second prayer for instructions to the jury.

The court declined to give these instructions, and this entitles the defendant to a new trial. And, as this substantially disposes of the matters controverted, we do not consider the other questions presented by the appeal. There is error.

N ew Trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleming v. . Davenport, 21 S.E. 188, 116 N.C. 153 (N.C. 1895).

21 S.E. 188 (Fleming v. . Davenport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brooks v. . Garrett
142 S.E. 486 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)