Fleming v. . Davenport
21 S.E. 188, 116 N.C. 153
Opinion
This case is controlled by Ballard v. Johnson, 114 N. C., 141, and is so fully discussed there, we see no reason for discussing it in this case.
*157 The defendant was entitled to bis second prayer for instructions to the jury.
The court declined to give these instructions, and this entitles the defendant to a new trial. And, as this substantially disposes of the matters controverted, we do not consider the other questions presented by the appeal. There is error.
N ew Trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fleming v. . Davenport, 21 S.E. 188, 116 N.C. 153 (N.C. 1895).
21 S.E. 188 (Fleming v. . Davenport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brooks v. . Garrett
142 S.E. 486 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1928)