Fleming v. Constantine

457 S.E.2d 714, 265 Ga. 525
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 5, 1995·No. S95A0303·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

[525] Sears, Justice.

Josephine Murray died testate in August 1993. Norma Fleming, the testator’s niece, and Irma Hutchinson, the testator’s sister, contested the probate of the will, contending that Murray lacked testamentary capacity. The trial court granted summary judgment to the will’s propounder, Katherine Constantine. We conclude that the caveators presented enough evidence of the testator’s unstable mental condition both before and after the will’s execution to create a jury question as to whether Murray was capable, when she executed the will, of rationally disposing of her property.1 Therefore, we hold that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment to the pro-pounder.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Hunt, C. J., Benham, P. J., and Fletcher, J., who dissent.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fleming v. Constantine, 457 S.E.2d 714, 265 Ga. 525 (Ga. 1995).

457 S.E.2d 714 (Fleming v. Constantine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Melican v. Parker
657 S.E.2d 234 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2008)
Doster v. Bates
568 S.E.2d 736 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2002)
Murchison v. Smith
508 S.E.2d 641 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1998)
Fleming v. Constantine
457 S.E.2d 714 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1995)