Fladell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

112 F. Supp. 3d 1323, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184292, 2014 WL 10017434
District Court, S.D. Florida·Decided March 17, 2014·No. Case No. 0:13-CV-60721·Published

Opinion

[1324] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, CERTIFYING CLASS FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES, DIRECTING THE ISSUANCE OF CLASS NOTICE, AND SCHEDULING A FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

FEDERICO A. MORENO, District Judge.

Upon review and consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, including the parties' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) and all exhibits thereto, and having been fully advised in the premises, it is HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED as follows:

1.Settlement. Plaintiff and Defendants have negotiated a potential settlement of this action (the “Fladell Litigar tion” or the “Action”) to avoid the expense, uncertainties, and burden of protracted litigation, and to resolve any and all claims or causes of action which have been or could be asserted by Plaintiff and/or other members of the Settlement Class in the Fladell Litigation against Defendants, and all of their past and present divisions, parents, subsidiaries, predecessors, investors, parent companies, acquired companies, and affiliated companies (which shall include any person or' entity which controls', is controlled by, or is under common control with any such party), including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc., Assurant, Inc., American Security Insurance Company, Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company, QBE Insurance Corporation, QBE FIRST Insurance Agency, Inc., QBE Financial Institution Risk Services, Inc., Praetorian Insurance Company, any direct or indirect subsidiary of any of Defendants and each of their respective past or present divisions, parents, subsidiaries, predecessors, investors, parent companies, acquired' companies, and affiliated companies, and all of the officers, directors, employees, agents, brokers, distributors, representatives, and attorneys of all such entities.

2. Review. The Court has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement, as well as the files, records, and proceedings to date in this matter. The terms and conditions in the Settlement Agreement are hereby incorporated as though fully set forth in this Order, and, unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms in this Order shall have the meanings attributed to them in the Settlement Agreement.

3. Preliminary Approval. The Settlement Agreement entered into by and among the Plaintiffs Ira Marc Fladell, Sarah Crouch, Greg Olson, Margaret Zawis-towski, Tilena Ali, Danny Lane, and Beverly Lane (“Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Settlement Class, and Defendants the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc., Assurant, Inc., American Security Insurance Company, Voyager Indemnity Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty .Insurance Company, QBE Specialty Insurance Company, QBE Insurance Corporation, QBE First Insurance Agency, Inc., QBE Financial Institution Risk Services, Inc., and Praetorian Insurance Company (collectively, “Defendants”) has been negotiated at arm’s length and is approved on a preliminary basis as fair, reasonable, and adequate.

4. Settlement Class Relief. The proposed Settlement Relief to the Settlement Class Members, as identified in Section 4 of the Settlement Agreement, is approved on a preliminary basis as fair, reasonable, and adequate. The Settlement Class shall consist of:

[1325] (a) All borrowers in the United 'States who, within the Class Period (as defined in Paragraph 4(b) below), were charged by the Wells Fargo Defendants under a hazard, flood, flood gap • or wind-only LPI Policy for residential property, and who, within the Class Period, either (i) paid to the Wells Fargo Defendants the Net Premium for that LPI Policy or (ii) did not pay to and still owe the Wells Fargo Defendants the Net Premium for that LPI Policy. ,¡
(b) The “Class Period” shall commence on the dates indicated below, based on the state in which the property is located, and shall continue through and including the date of the Preliminary Approval Order preliminarily approving the settlement:
1. California: October 7,2007.
2. Florida: September 2, 2006.
3. Illinois: July 5,2002.
4. Indiana: June 15, 2002.
5. Louisiana: February 19, 2003.
6. ,New Jersey:;. April 2,2007.
7. New York: July 5, 2006.
8. Ohio: August 8,1998.
9. Pennsylvania: April 7, 2005.
10. Texas: October 7,2007.
11. All other states: January 1, 2008.
(c) Excluded from the Class are: (i) individuals who are or were during the Class Period officers or directors of the Defendants or 'any of their respective affiliates; (ii) any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States or any State, their spouses, and persons within the third degree of relationship to either of them, or the •.spouses of such persons;- (iii) borrowers whose LPI Policy was cancelled in its.entirety such that any premiums charged and/or. collected were fully refunded -to ■
the borrower’s escrow account; (iv) borrowers who are members of the settlement classes in Williams v. Wells Fargo Bank (S.D.Fla. Case No. 1:11-CV-21233-RNS) or Guerrero v. Wells Fargo Bank (N.D.Cal. Case No. 12cv-4026 WHA); and, (v) all borrowers who file a timely and proper request to be excluded from the Class.

5. Preliminary Certification of Settlement Class. The Court makes the following determinations as to certification of the Settlement Class:

(a) The Court preliminarily certifies the Settlement Class for purposes of set- • tlement only, under Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) and (b)(3).
(b) The Settlement Class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable;
(c) There are questions of law or fact common to the members of the Settlement Class;
(d) The claims of the Plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the other members of the Settlement Class; ■
(e) Plaintiffs are' .capable of - fairly and adequately protecting the interests of the members of the Settlement Class, in connection with the Settlement Agreement;
(f) Common questions of law and fact predominate over questions affecting only individual members of the Settlement Class;
(g) The Settlement Class is ascertainable;
(h) Resolution of the claims in this Litigation by way of a nationwide settlement is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient resolution of the claims of the Settlement Class.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fladell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 112 F. Supp. 3d 1323, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 184292, 2014 WL 10017434 (S.D. Fla. 2014).

112 F. Supp. 3d 1323 (Fladell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related