Fitzhugh v. Truax

1 Hill & Den. 644
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 15, 1841
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hill & Den. 644 (Fitzhugh v. Truax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzhugh v. Truax, 1 Hill & Den. 644 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1841).

Opinion

By the Court, Cowen, J.

The affidavit of merits is insufficient. It is, that the defendant has stated the facts of his case ; whereas it should be, that he has stated the case, fee.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Rector
19 Wend. 569 (New York Supreme Court, 1838)
Brownell v. Marsh
22 Wend. 636 (New York Supreme Court, 1840)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hill & Den. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzhugh-v-truax-nysupct-1841.