Fitzhugh v. Truax
This text of 1 Hill & Den. 644 (Fitzhugh v. Truax) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The affidavit of merits is insufficient. It is, that the defendant has stated the facts of his case ; whereas it should be, that he has stated the case, fee.
Motion denied.
See Rule 61st, ed. of 1837; and also Rule 1st of May T. 1840, (22 Wend. 644.) The affidavit may be, that the party has stated this case, or his case; but not that he has stated his defence, &c. (Brownell v. Marsh, 22 Wend. 636.) Nor will it do to qualify the phraseology, by adding) “ so far as the facts have come to his knowledge,” or in any other manner, unless a sufficient excuse therefor be ex pressly shown. (Brown v. Tousey, 19 Wend. 616.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Hill & Den. 644, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzhugh-v-truax-nysupct-1841.