Brownell v. Marsh
22 Wend. 636
Opinion
By the Court,
An affidavit that the party has fully and fairly stated this case, or his case, to counsel, [637] fairly implies that he has stated the whole casé, and is a sufficient compliance, in that particular, with the 61st rule. But an affidavit that he has stated his defence to counsel, only implies that he has stated one side of the case,4 and is therefore insufficient.
Orders accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brownell v. Marsh, 22 Wend. 636 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1840).
22 Wend. 636 (Brownell v. Marsh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Larocque v. Conhaim
45 Misc. 234 (New York Supreme Court, 1904)
Jordan v. Garrison
6 How. Pr. 6 (New York Supreme Court, 1851)
Brittan v. Peabody
4 Hill & Den. 61 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1842)
Fitzhugh v. Truax
1 Hill & Den. 644 (New York Supreme Court, 1841)