Fitzgerald Dabel v. G.T.L. Automated Telephone System

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 16, 2025
Docket24-13846
StatusUnpublished

This text of Fitzgerald Dabel v. G.T.L. Automated Telephone System (Fitzgerald Dabel v. G.T.L. Automated Telephone System) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fitzgerald Dabel v. G.T.L. Automated Telephone System, (11th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-13846 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 01/16/2025 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13846 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

FITZGERALD DABEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus G.T.L. AUTOMATED TELEPHONE SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida USCA11 Case: 24-13846 Document: 10-1 Date Filed: 01/16/2025 Page: 2 of 2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13846

D.C. Docket No. 0:24-cv-61925-BB ____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Fitzgerald Dabel, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s October 18, 2024, order transferring the case to the Middle District of Florida under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because § 1406(a) transfer orders are not final and do not fall under the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000); Middlebrooks v. Smith, 735 F.2d 431, 432-33 (11th Cir. 1984); Stelly v. Emps. Nat’l Ins. Co., 431 F.2d 1251, 1253-54 (5th Cir. 1970). All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Fitzgerald Dabel v. G.T.L. Automated Telephone System, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fitzgerald-dabel-v-gtl-automated-telephone-system-ca11-2025.