Fitzgerald Dabel v. G.T.L. Automated Telephone System

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13846

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

FITZGERALD DABEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus G.T.L. AUTOMATED TELEPHONE SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SECURITY SYSTEM,

Defendants-Appellees.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13846

D.C. Docket No. 0:24-cv-61925-BB

____________________

Before JILL PRYOR, GRANT, and BRASHER Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Fitzgerald Dabel, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s October 18, 2024, order transferring the case to the Middle District of Florida under 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a). We lack jurisdiction over this appeal because § 1406(a) transfer orders are not final and do not fall under the collateral order doctrine. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291; CSX Transp., Inc. v. City of Garden City, 235 F.3d 1325, 1327 (11th Cir. 2000); Middlebrooks v. Smith, 735 F.2d 431, 432-33 (11th Cir. 1984); Stelly v. Emps. Nat’l Ins. Co., 431 F.2d 1251, 1253-54 (5th Cir. 1970).

All pending motions are DENIED as moot. No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.