Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin

771 F.3d 274, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 2014 WL 6375599
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. Read the opinion of the Court — 758 F.3d 633
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 12, 2014·No. 09-50822·Published

Opinions

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC-

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

The court having been polled at the request of one of its members, and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service and not disqualified not having voted in favor (Fed. R.App. P. 35 and 5th Cir. R. 35), the Petition for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED. Judge Garza, joined by Judges Jones, Smith, Clement, and Owen, dissents from the court’s denial of rehearing en banc, and his dissent is attached.

In the en banc poll, 5 judges voted in favor of rehearing (Judges Jones, Smith, Clement, Owen, and Elrod) and 10 judges voted against rehearing (Chief Judge Stewart and Judges Jolly, Davis, Dennis, Prado, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Hig-ginson, and Costa).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, 771 F.3d 274, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 21843, 2014 WL 6375599 (5th Cir. 2014).

771 F.3d 274 (Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Loving v. Virginia
388 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
438 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Grutter v. Bollinger
539 U.S. 306 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
133 S. Ct. 2411 (Supreme Court, 2013)
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
758 F.3d 633 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)