Fisher v. Pennsylvania, Department of Revenue (In Re Fisher)

117 B.R. 191, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1676, 20 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1389, 1990 WL 113920
CourtUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
DecidedJuly 30, 1990
Docket19-20773
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 117 B.R. 191 (Fisher v. Pennsylvania, Department of Revenue (In Re Fisher)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisher v. Pennsylvania, Department of Revenue (In Re Fisher), 117 B.R. 191, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1676, 20 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1389, 1990 WL 113920 (Pa. 1990).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BERNARD MARKOVITZ, Bankruptcy Judge.

Before the Court is Debtors’ Motion To Avoid Judicial Liens Pursuant To 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1).

*192 Debtors seek to avoid two (2) pre-petition judicial liens by McKelvey Oil Co., Inc. (“McKelvey”) in the amounts of $41,580.59 and $115,228.32, respectively, which liens, have attached to two (2) parcels of real property owned by Debtors. According to Debtors, they are entitled under 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1) to avoid all but $2,666.64 of these liens. Debtors further argue that they are entitled to “apportion” the surviving part of McKelvey’s lien so that all of it attaches to the real property containing a service station and none of it attaches to the real property containing their residence .and a garage.

McKelvey concedes that Debtors are entitled to partially avoid its judicial liens, but contends that the first of its liens survives in the amount of $24,365.82. In addition, McKelvey maintains that the surviving portion of its lien continues to attach to both parcels of real property, rather than only to that parcel containing the service station.

Debtors will be permitted, for reasons set forth below, to avoid all but $24,098.28 of McKelvey’s judicial liens. However, that portion which survives attaches to both parcels of real property. 1

BACKGROUND

Debtors filed a voluntary joint petition under chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code on February 20, 1990. At the time of filing, they owned (and continue to own) two (2) adjoining parcels of real property situated in Shade Township, Pennsylvania. The one property, which contains Debtors' residence and a large garage, was acquired in August of 1973 for $20,000.00. The second property, upon which is located a service station, was acquired at the same time for $45,000.00.

Debtors real property was subject to the following liens or encumbrances as of the date of their bankruptcy filing:

(1) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania $ 75.09
Statutory tax lien
Date: May 25, 1978
(2) National Bank of Western 24,913.63
Pennsylvania
First mortgage
Date: August 8, 1983
(3) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 367.32
Statutory tax lien
Date: February 6, 1986
(4) McKelvey Oil Company, Inc. 41,580.59
Judicial lien
Date: July 16, 1986
(5) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania 458.41
Statutory tax lien
Date: October 17, 1986
(6) American General Finance 2 2,571.69
Second mortgage
Date: April 13, 1987
(7) McKelvey Oil Company, Inc. 115,228.32
Judicial lien
Date: January 21, 1990

Debtors have claimed an exemption in each parcel of. real property. They have claimed an exemption in the amount of $12,514.68 in the residence/garage and another exemption of $1.00 in the service station.

ANALYSIS

11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1), pursuant to which Debtors seek to avoid McKelvey’s judicial liens, provides as follows:

Notwithstanding any waiver of exemptions, the debtor may avoid the fixing of a lien on an interest of the debtor in property to the extent that such lien impairs an exemption to which the debtor would have been entitled under subsection (b) of this section, if such lien is—
(1) a judicial lien; ...

The intent of Congress in enacting this provision was to provide debtors in chapter 7 cases with a “fresh start”, including some equity in their residence upon conclusion of the bankruptcy proceeding. See H.R.Rep. No. 595, 95th Cong., 1st Sess., p. 362, reprinted in 1978 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 5787, 5963, 6317.

As the above language makes clear, a debtor may avoid the fixing of a judicial lien on that debtor’s interest in property, *193 but only to the extent that such lien impairs an exemption to which the debtor would have been entitled under subsection 522(b). Since both McKelvey liens are judicial liens, and thus are subject to 11 U.S.C. § 522(f)(1), Debtors may avoid the liens to the extent that they impair Debtors’ right to claim allowed exemptions in their property.

The following procedure is to be employed when applying § 522(f)(1). The value of the property on which a judicial lien is sought to be avoided must first be determined. From that value is to be subtracted the total value of all liens not to be avoided and the total value of the debtor’s allowed exemptions. If the resultant value (after these subtractions have been made) is zero (or less), all judicial liens may be avoided. If the resultant value is greater than zero, judicial liens may not be avoided, in order of their priority, to the extent of that resultant value only. See, In re Magosin, 75 B.R. 545, 547 (Bankr.E.D.Pa.1987).

It was previously noted that Debtors purchased the property containing their residence and the garage in August of 1973 for $20,000.00. They also purchased the property containing the service station at or about the same time for $45,000.00. After hearing the testimony of the competing experts and having an opportunity to judge credibility, the Court determines that the combined value of the two (2) properties, both at the time of the filing of the bankruptcy petition and at this time, remains $65,000.00. The property containing the residence and garage has increased in value to $35,000.00, while the property containing the service station has decreased in value to $30,000.00.

It is undisputed that the following encumbrances or liens are not subject to avoidance in this case under § 522(f)(1):

(1) National Bank of Western Pennsylvania first mortgage: $ 24,913.63
(2) American General Finance second mortgage (residence and garage property only) 2,571.59
(3) Commonwealth of Pennsylvania statutory tax liens: 75.09

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Cross
164 B.R. 496 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1994)
PNC Bank, National Ass'n v. Balsamo
634 A.2d 645 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Osborne v. Dominion Bank, N.A. (In Re Osborne)
156 B.R. 188 (W.D. Virginia, 1993)
Frameli v. Reed Oil Co. (In Re Frameli)
155 B.R. 354 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
117 B.R. 191, 1990 Bankr. LEXIS 1676, 20 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1389, 1990 WL 113920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-pennsylvania-department-of-revenue-in-re-fisher-pawb-1990.