Fisher v. Huck
632 P.2d 1260, 291 Or. 566, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 1106
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 9, 1981
DocketA7903-01519 CA 16258 SC 27713
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 632 P.2d 1260 (Fisher v. Huck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fisher v. Huck, 632 P.2d 1260, 291 Or. 566, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 1106 (Or. 1981).
Opinion
Kenneth F. FISHER, Respondent,
v.
Jonathan Ray HUCK, Petitioner.
Supreme Court of Oregon.
Steven K. Blackhurst, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, Portland.
Larry Dawson, Portland, argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Before DENECKE, C.J., and LENT, LINDE, PETERSON, TANZER and CAMPBELL, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed, 50 Or. App. 635, 624 P.2d 177, by stipulation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Straight Grain Builders v. Track N' Trail
760 P.2d 1350 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1988)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
632 P.2d 1260, 291 Or. 566, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-huck-or-1981.