Fisher v. Fisher

98 Mass. 303
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by27 cases

This text of 98 Mass. 303 (Fisher v. Fisher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisher v. Fisher, 98 Mass. 303 (Mass. 1867).

Opinion

By the Court.

The doctrine of merger of a simple contract in the higher security of a judgment on such contract is wholly inapplicable to this case. The note in suit was pledged as collateral security for a debt due to the plaintiffs from the pledger, and this pledge continued valid and effectual until such debt was paid or discharged, notwithstanding the evidence of it had been changed from a promissory note to a judgment of a court of record thereon.

The evidence established that the plaintiffs received the note from the holder before its maturity, without any knowledge of the circumstances under which the defendants had delivered it to the payee, or the purpose for which the latter delivered it to the holder, and that it was held by the plaintiffs as collateral security for a valid debt due from the holder to them. Under the decisions of the court, these facts proved that the plaintiffs were bond fide holders for value and without notice, and were therefore entitled to recover to the extent of their debt for which the xote was pledged as collateral security. Stoddard v. Kimball, 6 Cush. 469. Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Webb v. Johnston
140 N.E. 814 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1923)
Hanby v. Cahaba Coal Co.
75 So. 964 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1917)
Burnes v. New Mineral Fertilizer Co.
105 N.E. 1074 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Hills v. Flynn
161 A.D. 127 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)
Elk Valley Coal Co. v. Third National Bank
163 S.W. 766 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1914)
Johnson v. Grayson
130 S.W. 673 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
Spaulding v. Kendrick
51 N.E. 453 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1898)
Yellowstone National Bank v. Gagnon
44 L.R.A. 243 (Montana Supreme Court, 1897)
New England Trust Co. v. New York Belting & Packing Co.
43 N.E. 928 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1896)
Wright v. John T. Hardie & Co.
32 S.W. 885 (Texas Supreme Court, 1895)
Bateman v. Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad
56 N.W. 28 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)
Everman v. Hyman
29 N.E. 1140 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1892)
Farmers' State Bank v. Blevins
46 Kan. 536 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1891)
Goodwin v. Massachusetts Loan & Trust Co.
25 N.E. 100 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Barton v. Radclyffe
21 N.E. 374 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1889)
Handy v. Sibley
46 Ohio St. (N.S.) 9 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1888)
Hatcher & Co. v. Independence National Bank of Philadelphia
5 S.E. 111 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1888)
Morton & Bliss v. New Orleans & Selma Railway Co.
79 Ala. 590 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1885)
Jewett v. Tucker
2 N.E. 680 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 Mass. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-fisher-mass-1867.