Fisher v. City of San Jose

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Fisher v. City of San Jose. Read the opinion of the Court — 558 F.3d 1069
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2008·No. 04-16095·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

STEVEN FISHER,  Plaintiff-Appellee, and SANDRA FISHER, Plaintiff, v. No. 04-16095 CITY OF SAN JOSE, D.C. No. CV-01-21192-PVT Defendant-Appellant, and  Northern District of California, CITY OF SAN JOSE POLICE San Jose DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BOLER; ORDER OFFICER BARNETT; OFFICER CORREA; OFFICER ESQUIVEL; OFFICER HONDA; OFFICER KINSWORTHY; OFFICER O’BRIEN; OFFICER RYAN; OFFICER NGUYEN, Defendants.  Filed March 14, 2008

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

2653 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fisher v. City of San Jose, (9th Cir. 2008).

Fisher v. City of San Jose (Fisher v. City of San Jose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.