Fisher v. City of San Jose
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, and SANDRA FISHER, Plaintiff, v. No. 04-16095 CITY OF SAN JOSE, D.C. No. CV-01-21192-PVT Defendant-Appellant, and Northern District of California, CITY OF SAN JOSE POLICE San Jose DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BOLER; ORDER OFFICER BARNETT; OFFICER CORREA; OFFICER ESQUIVEL; OFFICER HONDA; OFFICER KINSWORTHY; OFFICER O’BRIEN; OFFICER RYAN; OFFICER NGUYEN, Defendants. Filed March 14, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
2653 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fisher v. City of San Jose (Fisher v. City of San Jose) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.