Fisher v. City of San Jose
This text of Fisher v. City of San Jose (Fisher v. City of San Jose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN FISHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, and SANDRA FISHER, Plaintiff, v. No. 04-16095 CITY OF SAN JOSE, D.C. No. CV-01-21192-PVT Defendant-Appellant, and Northern District of California, CITY OF SAN JOSE POLICE San Jose DEPARTMENT; OFFICER BOLER; ORDER OFFICER BARNETT; OFFICER CORREA; OFFICER ESQUIVEL; OFFICER HONDA; OFFICER KINSWORTHY; OFFICER O’BRIEN; OFFICER RYAN; OFFICER NGUYEN, Defendants. Filed March 14, 2008
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
2653 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fisher v. City of San Jose, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-city-of-san-jose-ca9-2008.