Home/New York Court of Appeals/Fisher v. Bartley

Fisher v. Bartley

11 N.E.2d 301, 275 N.Y. 469, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1457
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 13, 1937
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 11 N.E.2d 301 (Fisher v. Bartley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fisher v. Bartley, 11 N.E.2d 301, 275 N.Y. 469, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1457 (N.Y. 1937).

Opinion

Judgments reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. It was error to instruct the jury in the text of the memorandum decision of the Appellate Division rendered on the former appeal (246 App. Div. 609). These instructions in effect allowed the jury to find the defendants liable for a mere error of judgment. No opinion. (See 275 N. Y. 544.)

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien and Lough-ran, JJ. Dissenting: Hubbs, Finch and Rippey, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisher v. Bartley
11 N.E.2d 744 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 N.E.2d 301, 275 N.Y. 469, 1937 N.Y. LEXIS 1457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fisher-v-bartley-ny-1937.