Firtag v. Gendleman
This text of 152 F. Supp. 226 (Firtag v. Gendleman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Gabriel FIRTAG et ux., Plaintiffs,
v.
Maurice J. GENDLEMAN, et al., Co-Partners, Trading as Auburn Esso Service, Defendants.
United States District Court District of Columbia.
Earl H. Davis, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiffs.
Justin L. Edgerton, of Washington, D. C., for defendants.
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is a motion to retax costs. The Court is of the opinion that the following items are not taxable as costs:
Fees of expert witnesses in excess of the statutory witness fees.
Cost of copies of depositions obtained for counsel's use as distinguished from the cost of the original deposition.
Cost of a transcript of the proceedings at the trial, be it an entire transcript or partial. It is a taxable item only if the transcript is ordered by the court. It is not taxable if counsel orders it for his own use.
In view of these considerations the action of the clerk in disallowing the above items is sustained and the motion to retax costs is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 F. Supp. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/firtag-v-gendleman-dcd-1957.